1$ TAX ON SS CHECKS-THIS WILL GET YOU GOING...

Direct Deposit for SS check 


ON JANUARY 1ST 2012, THE GOVERNMENT IS REQUIRING EVERYONE TO HAVE DIRECT DEPOSIT FOR SS CHECKS. WONDER WHY?
1% tax on all bank transactions HR4646


Your income tax isn't enough for them. They got to gouge you another 1%.
Watch for this AFTER November elections; remember this        BEFORE you VOTE in case you think Obama's looking out for your best interest. 
        1% tax on all bank transactions HR 4646 
        This government just cannot think of enough ways to hurt the American people! I sure hope this dies!!!!!

        FORWARD THIS TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW! 
        1% tax on all bank transactions HR 4646 - ANOTHER NEW OBAMA TAX SLIPPED        IN WHILE WE WERE ASLEEP. Checked this on snopes, it's true! Check out HR 4646.




President Obama's finance team is recommending a one percent (1%) transaction fee (TAX). Obama's plan is to sneak it in after the November elections to keep it under the radar.


        This is a 1% tax on all transactions at any financial institution - banks, credit unions, savings and loans, etc. Any deposit you make, or even a transfer within your account, will have a 1% tax charged. ~If your paycheck or your social security or whatever is direct deposit, it will get a 1% tax charged for the transaction. ~If your paycheck is $1000, then you will pay Obama $10 just for the privilege of depositing your paycheck in your bank. Even if you hand carry your paycheck or any check into your bank for a deposit, 1% tax will be charged. ~You receive a $5,000 stock dividend from your broker, Obama takes $50 just to allow you to deposit that check in the bank.. ~If you take $1,000 cash to deposit at your bank, 1% tax will be charged. 
        Mind you, this is from the man who promised that, if you make under $250,000 per year, you will not see one penny of new tax. Keep your eyes and ears open, you will be amazed at what you learn about this guy's under-the-table moves to increase the number of ways you are taxed. 
        Oh, and by the way, if you receive a refund from the IRS next year and you have it direct deposited or you walk in to deposit that check, you guessed it. You will pay a 1% charge of that money just for putting it in your bank. Remember, any money, cash, check or whatever, no matter where it came from, you will pay a 1% fee if you put it in the bank. 
        Some will say, oh well, it's just 1%. Are you kidding me? It's a 1% tax increase across the board. Remember, once the tax is there, they can also raise it at will. And if anyone protests, they will just say, "Oh,that's not really a tax, it's a user fee"! Think this is        no big deal? Go back and look at the transactions you made on one year's banking statements. Then add the total of all those transactions and deduct 1%. Still think it's no big deal?


" A government big enough to give you everything you want is also big enough to take away everything you have." - Barry  Goldwater

Supreme Court Justice wants to change Constitution.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg wants to change the Constitution she is sworn to uphold.

One member of the U.S. Supreme Court, whose members are sworn to uphold the Constitution of the United States, says she would look elsewhere – Canada, South Africa and Europe – should she be tasked with writing a constitution now.

The stunning statements come from Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

She was being interviewed by Al Hayat in Egypt, which is trying to develop a government after citizens deposed longtime dictator President Hosni Mubarack last year.

Egypt is facing major obstacles to a democratic form of government as the Muslim Brotherhood as a political party has been assembling a majority in the country. Among its goals is a Muslim caliphate worldwide.

She was asked: “Would your honor’s advice be to get a part of other countries’ constitutions as a model, or should we develop our own draft?

Her response:

“You should certainly be aided by all the constitution-writing that has gone on since the end of World War II. I would not look to the U.S. constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012. I might look at the constitution of South Africa. That was a deliberate attempt to have a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights, had an independent judiciary. It really is, I think, a great piece of work that was done.

“Much more recent than the U.S. Constitution is Canada has a Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It dates from 1982. You would almost certainly look at the European Convention on Human Rights. Yes, why not take advantage of what there is elsewhere in the world? I’m a very strong believer in listening and learning from others.”

Mathew Staver, chief of Liberty Counsel, said her attitude is problematic.

“For a sitting U.S. Supreme Court justice to speak derisively about the Constitution she is sworn to uphold is distressing, to say the least. Justice Ginsburg’s comments about our Constitution undermine the Supreme Court as an institution dedicated to the rule of law, as well as our founding document.”

According to Liberty Counsel, “For a United States Supreme Court justice, entrusted with the duty to interpret the Constitution, this type of statement is unacceptable. Justice Ginsburg failed to respect the authority of the document that it is her duty to protect. When given the opportunity to promote American liberty abroad, Justice Ginsburg did just the opposite and pointed Egypt in the direction of progressivism and the liberal agenda.”

Ginsburg also noted that among her favorite parts of the Constitutions is the provision that judges’ salaries cannot be reduced, as well as a guarantee of independence to judges.

She also said the U.S. Constitution is “rather old,” and told Egyptians that a constitution will mean nothing unless the people it serves and protects desire liberty and freedom.

“If the people don’t care, then the best constitution in the world won’t make any difference,” she said.

In a commentary at Slate, David Weigel said, “Ginsburg has disturbed the balance of the universe by giving an interview to Egyptian television in which she does not recommend using the U.S. Constitution as a model for post-Mubarak happiness.”

He continued, “If you want, here you go: Proof that a Supreme Court justice … looks to other countries for advice on an evolving Constitution! Of course, we’ve known this about Ginsburg for years, because she’s said so repeatedly.”

At American Spectator, John Tabin said she “gets one of nine votes on the functional meaning of the U.S. Constitution. That she thinks the age of the Constitution she’s charged with interpreting make[s] it deficient relative to newer constitutions is kind of shocking, particularly in the context of her praise for the rights enshrined in the First Amendment – rights that, in practice, are protected far less robustly in South Africa or Canada or Europe than they are in the U.S.

SUPREME COURT RULES GPS TRACKING WITHOUT WARRANT ILLEGAL

GPS tracking without a warrant illegal..

This case the SC has taken up on Drug Sniffing Dog searches may be a little more interesting.

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/state/supreme-court-to-take-up-case-of-miami-2105257.html

Opinion

http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10-1259.pdf

http://www.star-telegram.com/2012/01/23/3679803/high-court-warrant-needed-for.html

High court: warrant needed for GPS tracking

Posted Monday, Jan. 23, 2012 0 Comments Print Reprints Share

Topics: GPS Devices

By PETE YOST and JESSE H. HOLLAND

Associated Press

WASHINGTON ­ The Supreme Court ruled unanimously Monday that police must get a search warrant before using GPS technology to track criminal suspects.

The GPS device helped authorities link Washington, D.C., nightclub owner Antoine Jones to a suburban house used to stash money and drugs. He was sentenced to life in prison before the appeals court overturned the conviction.

Associate Justice Antonin Scalia said that the government's installation of a GPS device, and its use to monitor the vehicle's movements, constitutes a search, meaning that a warrant is required.

"By attaching the device to the Jeep" that Jones was using, "officers encroached on a protected area," Scalia wrote.

All nine justices agreed that the placement of the GPS on the Jeep violated the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable search and seizure.

Scalia wrote the main opinion of three in the case. He was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas and Sonia Sotomayor.

Sotomayor also wrote one of the two concurring opinions that agreed with the outcome in the Jones case for different reasons.

Justice Samuel Alito also wrote a concurring opinion in which he said the court should have gone further and dealt with GPS tracking of wireless devices, like mobile phones. He was joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan.

A federal appeals court in Washington had overturned Jones's drug conspiracy conviction because police did not have a warrant when they installed a GPS device on his vehicle and then tracked his movements for a month. The Supreme Court agreed with the appeals court.

The case is U.S. v. Jones, 10-1259

COLLAPSE OF DOLLAR

The Road to Roota Theory postulates that there is a group of people in the United States as well as around the world that are working to remove and destroy the financial banking powers that have secretly controlled all aspects of our lives for hundreds of years. The original idea of this group sprang from the mind of Alan Greenspan and involved rigging markets with computer programs that he had invented in the 1960's. The original articles can be found here: The Original Road to Roota http://www.roadtoroota.com/public/120.cfm My understanding of the way the world worked was blown to bits and replaced with a more unified theory on all things monetary... all things that lead us down The Road to Roota otherwise known as the Road to the Gold Standard. Greenspan's Golden Secret http://www.roadtoroota.com/public/101.cfm The following concepts are the key support pillars in The Road to Roota Theory and I have linked the support articles as back up. Once you understand these concepts you will understand what is happening all around you as the world you once knew comes crumbling down to be replaced by a new and better system. KEY COMPONENTS OF THE ROAD TO ROOTA THEORY: 1) All markets have been 100% controlled by computer programs since the 1970's in order to steer and control prices thus prolonging the fiat monetary system. http://www.roadtoroota.com/public/94.cfm 2) A powerful cabal of the world's elite have taken over that market manipulation process and twisted it to enhance their own profits while pretending to service their nation's best interests. http://www.roadtoroota.com/public/133.cfm 3) In the early 1900's the United States embarked on a secret policy to hide all of its own natural resources and exploit the rest of the world's until resource scarcity was fully recognized. http://www.roadtoroota.com/public/181.cfm 4) In order to support the oil backed US Dollar and the world's petro-based economic system the "powers that be" have hidden new energy technologies that would greatly benefit the world's population as well as the environment. http://www.roadtoroota.com/public/141.cfm 5) Since 911 there is a group of people and governments that have decided "enough is enough" and are in the process of removing the banking cabal from their seat of power. http://www.roadtoroota.com/public/120.cfm 6) The planned destruction of the fiat monetary system is the type of "Creative Destruction" event that will force the implementation of a new Gold Standard within the United States. http://www.roadtoroota.com/public/117.cfm You may argue all you want about my interpretation and conclusions but there will be no arguing the final results. When the final crash comes the facts will show that the Road to Roota Theory was the closest thing to a "correct analysis" of the gold market available at this time in history. This is your peek behind the curtain of the Great and Powerful OZ! As we read the papers today the events are unfolding before us. The real question now is what will happen in the future? Will we be cast into a deep and dark depression with no hope for future generations or will we survive and even thrive as we make this transition? Here is my interpretation of all the information found in the RoadtoRoota.com archives: http://www.roadtoroota.com/public/department36.cfm These conclusions may sound way too positive and outrageously naive but everything I watch points to a very bright future…even if it takes a few bumps to get there! 1) The collapse of the fiat monetary system will be total and complete equalizing the playing field between the "haves" and the "have-nots". 2) All paper/electronic debt and assets will evaporate with the collapse of the fiat money system. 3) Those who have perpetrated the outrageous and monstrous crimes of the past 100 years will be hunted down and prosecuted (if they are lucky). 4) The US will issue a new gold backed currency (domestically) allocating it according to future social security payments due. 5) The US will allocate much of the new gold backed money to support the funding of schools, police, health care, infrastructure and other necessities for a fully functioning society. 6) Globalization will end upon the collapse of the derivative structure and all countries will end global trade concentrating on their own internal commerce. 7) All US overseas troops will return home to protect our borders and ensure the safety of our citizens. 8) The US population will be fully employed working to replace all the overseas production lost in the reversal of Globalization. 9) The United States will tap into its VAST natural resources that have been hidden away for years in National Parks, Military Bases and sites deemed "Ecologically Sensitive". 10) A vast array of new energy technologies will be revealed since there will be no more need for the "oil standard" that has supported the US Dollar for the past 50 years. 11) The implementation of the new monetary system will usher in a glorious new "Golden Age" that the world will embrace after years of being lead around like "Sheeple". We are on the cusp of something truly momentous in the history of the human race. With the full transition there is no need to lose the free markets system. Truthfully, a true "Free Market" system has never been given the chance it deserves with all the market rigging of the past 100 years. We will be free again. We will resurrect our Constitution and we will make the United States of America the Land of Liberty that our forefathers envisioned. Let's pray that the change is peaceful. May the Road you choose be the Right Road. Bix Weir

1st 5th and 6th Amendments gone..2nd Amendment next...

Why Grandpa carries a gun.

Please take time to read this and pay particular attention to "A Little Gun History" about half way down.

Why Grandpa carries a gun scroll way down

PEOPLE ASK WHY?

Why Carry a Gun?

 My old grandpa said to me 'Son, there comes a time in every man's life when he stops bustin' knuckles and starts bustin' caps and usually it's when he becomes too old to take an ass whoopin.'

>I don't carry a gun to kill people.

>I carry a gun to keep from being killed.

> 

>I don't carry a gun to scare people.

>I carry a gun because sometimes this world can be a scary place.

> 

>I don't carry a gun because I'm paranoid.

>I carry a gun because there are real threats in the world.

>

>I don't carry a gun because I'm evil.

>I carry a gun because I have lived long enough to see the evil in the world.

>

>I don't carry a gun because I hate the government.

>I carry a gun because I understand the limitations of government.

>

>I don't carry a gun because I'm angry.

>I carry a gun so that I don't have to spend the rest of my life hating myself for failing to be prepared.

>

>I don't carry a gun because I want to shoot someone.

>I carry a gun because I want to die at a ripe old age in my bed, and not on a sidewalk somewhere tomorrow afternoon.

>

>I don't carry a gun because I'm a cowboy.

>I carry a gun because, when I die and go to heaven, I want to be a cowboy.

>

>I don't carry a gun to make me feel like a man.

>I carry a gun because men know how to take care of themselves and the ones they love.

>      

>I don't carry a gun because I feel inadequate.

>I carry a gun because unarmed and facing three armed thugs, I am inadequate.      

>

>I don't carry a gun because I love it.

>I carry a gun because I love life and the people who make it meaningful to me.      

>

>Police protection is an oxymoron.

>Free citizens must protect themselves.

>Police do not protect you from crime, they usually just investigate the crime after it happens and then call someone in to clean up the mess.

>      

>Personally, I carry a gun because I'm too young to die

>and too old to take an ass whoopin'.....author unknown (but obviously brilliant)

>      

>**********************************************

>A LITTLE GUN HISTORY

> 

>In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control.       

>From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

>       ------------------------------

> 

>In 1911, Turkey established gun control.

>From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.      

> ------------------------------

> 

>Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, a total of 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.

> ------------------------------      

> 

>China established gun control in 1935.

>From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

>       ------------------------------

> 

>Guatemala established gun control in 1964.

>From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.        

> 

>Uganda established gun control in 1970.

>From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.        

> 

>Cambodia established gun control in 1956.

>From1975 to 1977, one million educated people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

>       -----------------------------

> 

>Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated

>in the 20th Century because of gun control: 56 million.

>------------------------------

>

>You won't see this data on the US evening news, or hear politicians disseminating this information.

> 

>Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property

>and, yes, gun-control laws adversely affect only the law-abiding citizens.

> 

>Take note my fellow Americans, before it's too late!

> 

>The next time someone talks in favor of gun control, please remind them of this history lesson.

> 

>With guns, we are 'citizens'.      

>Without them, we are 'subjects'.

>

>During WW II the Japanese decided not to invade America because they knew most       Americans were ARMED!

> 

>If you value your freedom, please spread this anti gun-control message to all of your friends.      

>

>The purpose of fighting is to win.      

> 

>There is no possible victory in defense.       

> 

>The sword is more important than the shield, and skill is more important than either.

> 

>The final weapon is the brain.

> 

>All else is supplemental.      

> 

>SWITZERLAND ISSUES EVERY HOUSEHOLD A GUN!      

>SWITZERLAND'S GOVERNMENT TRAINS EVERY ADULT THEY ISSUE A RIFLE.      

>SWITZERLAND HAS THE LOWEST GUN RELATED

>CRIME RATE OF ANY       CIVILIZED COUNTRY IN THE WORLD!!!

> 

>IT'S A NO BRAINER!      

>DON'T LET OUR GOVERNMENT WASTE MILLIONS OF OUR TAX DOLLARS      

>IN AN EFFORT TO MAKE ALL LAW ABIDING CITIZENS AN EASY TARGET.      

>

>I'm a firm believer in the 2nd Amendment!

>If you are too, please forward

Senator Mark Begich non-reply e-mail First Amendment rights

All the Senators and President are sworn to uphold the Constitution but will violate their Oath of Office in favor of corporate money--or at least that is their excuse for taking away your Right to free Speech and your 4th and 5th Amendment Rights. How are candidates going to get the word out prior to the election if all blogs and e-mails are censored by the government? This is a political end-run to restrict free speech, your right to assemble and your right to petition the government for redress of grievance.

The Military Appreciations bill signed on New Years in Hawaii by Barack Obama allows the military to lock up Americans on American soil or anywhere  if someone decides they are a terrorist. This is the McCarthy Era all over again--only instead of locking up accused Communists forever without trial its people accused of terrorism and that could include speaking out against this bill.


January19, 2012

DearMr. Kroll:

Thank you for contacting me about the ProtectingReal Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property Act(PROTECT IP). I support a free and open Internet.

With online commerce continuingto grow and evolve as a significant portion of our country's economy—as well as day-to-day life for many Alaskans—it isimportant we maintain the free flow of information while at the same time protecting users against the threatof cyber theft or attack.  The debate about how to protect intellectual property rights andfight online piracy and counterfeit operations has been goingon for over a decade.

Both the PROTECT IP Actand the version in the House of Representatives, the StopOnline Piracy Act (SOPA), have received a large amount of attention from consumers and companies who are concerned about the impacton innovation and the flow of information online.  I believe intellectual property rights should be respectedand we should address how they areenforced.  However, I do not feel the protectionsshould restrict the flow of information through search engines or technical alterations. I will continue to review the legislation and details as we move closer to a vote.

I am continuing to monitor the development of online commerce which I believe will help grow businesses in Alaska.  Online privacy and the protection of freespeech are importantto Alaskans, and I appreciatehearing your comments on pending legislation.

Please feel free to stay in touch as we continue to debate these issues.

Sincerely,
Mark Begich
U.S. Senator

INTERNET CENSORING BILL, BLOGS BANNED, SOCIAL NETWORKS BANNED

Internet Takeover Bill

United States Justice Foundation

932 "D" Street, Suite 2

Ramona, California 92065

760-788-6624   USJF.NET

01/10/2012

Dear Kenneth,

The final U. S. Senate vote on the internet takeover bill is set for January 24th.  As of right now, that bill, which gives U. S. Attorney General Eric Holder the power of an "Internet Czar,” WILL PASS.

Please send faxes to every Member of the U.S. Senate, and demand that they filibuster S. 968, the Senate version of the internet takeover bill.

Unfortunately, the American people are not paying attention to this catastrophe that is unfolding in the U. S. Senate.  We only have a few days to stop this unconstitutional power grab.  We must bombard the Senate with faxes, RIGHT NOW!

This bill will give corrupt U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder the power to blacklist or shut down any website or forum that is merely accused of being linked to "online piracy”.

He will even have the authority to "sanitize” the results of internet searches on Google or Yahoo, so that only government-approved websites and information can be found online.

If this bill passes, Barack Hussein Obama will have to the ability to ban the campaign websites of his opponents, shut down the online activities of anti-Obama groups like USJF, and harass tea party forums and any other website that don't support him.

Please fax the U. S. Senate now.  This bill WILL PASS unless the American people overwhelm the Senate with faxes!

And, while you are at it, please forward this email to everyone in your lists.

The FINAL U. S. Senate vote is scheduled for January 24th.  We don't have much time!

If this bill passes, the Obama Administration won't need a court order.  There will be no hearings or trials.

Barack Hussein Obama, Jr., will seize incredible control over the internet, and we will be nearly powerless to stop him.

Although supporters of the bill say that it is designed to prevent online piracy, this is an internet takeover bill, pure and simple.

Just one "complaint” from a liberal activist, or a government agent, that you are indirectly violating an obscure copyright rule, and your website could be fined huge sums, and it could be blacklisted from the internet.

Just imagine if Google was prohibited from displaying websites that were critical of Barack Obama, that discussed the controversy over where he was born, or that mentioned the damage that his policies are doing to the economy.

Well, that is exactly what will ultimately happen if S.968 passes, and it is signed into law.

Many of this bill's provisions are modeled on Communist China's censorship law, called the "Great Firewall of China.”

Even the socialists in the European Parliament oppose this new American law.

That is how extreme S.968 is!

S.968 already has 40 co-sponsors in the U.S. Senate.   Eleven more votes and it passes!

Please fax every U. S. Senator NOW.

Extreme liberals like Chuck Schumer and Al Franken have teamed up with Republicans like John McCain and Lindsey Graham to ram this bill into law.

They are being helped by millions of dollars in campaign contributions from  left-wing mainstream media companies.

They want the government to shut down all the blogs and political forums, and all of the independent news sites, so that they, once again, will have a monopoly on the news that you and I are allowed to see.

This threat against free speech is so grave and so imminent that websites like Google and Yahoo are seriously considering staging a last-ditch online protest to try to stop Mr. Obama and his Congressional allies!

Please, fax every Member of the U. S. Senate NOW, and please forward this email to all of your friends, urging them to do the same.

This bill WILL PASS unless you take action TODAY.

And, while you are at it, please add to the effectiveness of your faxes by personally calling your U.S. Senators' offices at 202-224-3121.  Tell him, or her, to STOP S. 968, the internet takeover bill.

The final vote is January 24th.  We only have days remaining to save free speech on the internet!

Sincerely,

Gary G. Kreep, Esq.

Executive Director

United States Justice Foundation